STATION 1
School Strike 4 Climate
Global Youth Climate Movement

📊 Movement Background

Key Facts:

Started: August 2018, by Greta Thunberg (Sweden)

Global Scale: Over 6 million participants across 150+ countries

Peak Action: September 2019 - 4 million strikers worldwide

New Zealand: 170,000+ students participated (March 2019)

Age Range: Primarily school students (5-18 years old)

Organising Strategies:

• Social Media Coordination: #FridaysForFuture hashtag

• Decentralized Leadership: Local students led their own strikes

• Clear Demands: Government climate emergency declarations

• Sustained Pressure: Weekly Friday strikes for months

• Media Strategy: Youth voices centred in all communications

What Made It Powerful:

• Students organised themselves, not adults organising for them

• Clear moral message: "You're stealing our future"

• Global solidarity - same day, same message worldwide

• Students chose school strike as their form of protest

🎯 Analysis Questions

Power Building:

  • How did students organise globally without traditional power structures?
  • What collective power did they build that individual climate activists couldn't achieve?
  • How did they use their identity as students strategically?

Targeting Decision-Makers:

  • Who were their target audiences? (Politicians, parents, general public)
  • How did school strikes pressure these targets differently than other protests?
  • What role did media coverage play in amplifying their message?

Changes Achieved:

  • What concrete policy changes resulted from their organising?
  • How did they shift public conversation about climate change?
  • What power did they demonstrate young people have before voting age?

Collective vs Individual Action:

  • How was this different from individual environmental activism?
  • What role did solidarity and collective identity play?
  • How did organising together create more pressure than individual efforts?

📋 Teacher Planning Snapshot

Ngā Whāinga Ako — Learning Intentions

Students will engage with this resource to apply systems thinking to real-world civic and community challenges — analysing feedback loops, leverage points, and emergent properties within social, environmental, and governance systems in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Ngā Paearu Angitū — Success Criteria

Differentiation & Inclusion

Scaffold support: Provide systems mapping templates and sentence starters for entry-level access. Offer extension tasks asking students to identify a second-order effect or design an intervention at a leverage point within their chosen system.

ELL / ESOL: Pre-teach systems thinking vocabulary (feedback loop, leverage point, emergence, interdependence) using visual diagrams. Allow students to annotate systems maps in their home language first.

Inclusion: Use visual, spatial, and collaborative formats wherever possible — systems maps are inherently accessible for diverse learners. Neurodiverse learners benefit from structured inquiry steps and chunked analysis tasks. Ensure group roles are clearly defined.

Mātauranga Māori lens: Systems thinking has deep resonance with Te Ao Māori. Whakapapa is a relational map of systems — tracing connections between people, place, and time. Kaitiakitanga frames our responsibility within systems. Mauri provides a measure of system health. These indigenous concepts enrich Western systems thinking frameworks.

Prior knowledge: Students should have completed foundational systems thinking lessons (phases 1–2) before engaging with phase 3 inquiry tasks. No specialist prior knowledge required for standalone resources.

Curriculum alignment