← Unit Overview | Lesson 1 🖨️ Print this page
 
 
 
Te Anga PEE — Quick Reference
P
Perspective: Name the group. State their view using specific language. ("Māori rangatira believed..." / "The British Crown maintained...")
E
Evidence: Cite a specific source — who wrote it, when, what it said. Not vague ("people said") — specific ("In his 1863 memorandum, Governor Grey stated...")
E
Explanation: WHY did they hold this perspective? Connect to their identity, values, context, and what was at stake for them. This is where Merit & Excellence live.
Tirohanga Tuatahi — Perspective 1 Group / Rōpū: _______________________
P Perspective — What did they believe?
Use specific language: "[Group] believed / maintained / held that..."
E Evidence — What specific source proves this?
Who wrote it? When? What did it say? (quote if possible)
E Explanation — WHY did they hold this perspective?
What identity, values, or context shaped their view? What did they stand to gain or lose?
Tirohanga Tuarua — Perspective 2 Group / Rōpū: _______________________
P Perspective — What did they believe?
"[Group] viewed this event as... because..."
E Evidence — What specific source proves this?
E Explanation — WHY did they hold this perspective?
What did this group value above everything else? How did their context make their view feel necessary or inevitable?
Tirohanga Tuatoru — Perspective 3 Group / Rōpū: _______________________
P Perspective — What did they believe?
E Evidence — What specific source proves this?
E Explanation — WHY did they hold this perspective?
⭐ Whakahōhonu — Excellence Extension
Why were these perspectives irreconcilable? What core value or worldview clash made agreement impossible? This is the heart of your excellence conclusion.
Paearu Angitu — Self-check before you write your assessment:
A I named three distinct groups and described what each believed.
M I explained WHY each group held their perspective using specific evidence and context.
E I analysed how the perspectives interacted and why they were irreconcilable. I discussed significance.

📋 Teacher Planning Snapshot

Ngā Whāinga Ako — Learning Intentions

The unit's core P·E·E planning organiser — one page, three perspectives, with a quick-reference panel defining each move.

Ngā Paearu Angitū — Success Criteria

Differentiation & Inclusion

Scaffold support: This organiser is used from Lesson 1 onward, so its familiarity is the scaffold. Students working below Achieved should complete P and the first E for all three groups before attempting any second E. Extend by requiring two pieces of evidence per perspective.

ELL / ESOL: The quick-reference panel supplies worked sentence openings for each of the three moves, so the English structure is given and the historical judgement is not.

Inclusion: One page, three identical blocks — the repetition is deliberate and lets a student who stalls on one perspective move to the next and return.

Mātauranga Māori: The organiser's own example uses “Māori rangatira believed…” against “The British Crown maintained…”. Hold that symmetry: both are named actors with reasons, and neither is the default against which the other is the exception.

Prior knowledge: Introduced in Lesson 1 and reused in Lessons 3 to 8. Not tied to a single lesson.