๐Ÿ“œ Primary Source Analysis

Unit 2: Decolonized History - Centering Multiple Perspectives

Student Name: _________________________________

Date: _________________________________

Document Title: _________________________________

๐Ÿ“‹ How to Use This Template

Primary sources are original documents from the time period being studied. When analyzing history - especially Aotearoa's colonial history - we must ask: Whose voice is this? What perspectives are missing? How might the story change if told by someone else?

๐Ÿ“Œ STEP 1: Basic Information

What TYPE of document is this?

โ˜ Letter
โ˜ Speech
โ˜ Treaty/Agreement
โ˜ Newspaper Article
โ˜ Government Report
โ˜ Diary/Journal
โ˜ Photograph
โ˜ Other: _______________

When was it created?

Where was it created?

๐Ÿ‘ค STEP 2: Author & Context

Who created this document?

What was the author's position/role in society?

โ˜ Colonial Official
โ˜ Rangatira (Chief)
โ˜ Settler
โ˜ Missionary
โ˜ Soldier
โ˜ Journalist
โ˜ Ordinary Citizen
โ˜ Other: _______________

What was the author's cultural/ethnic background?

Why do you think they created this document? (Purpose/Audience)

๐Ÿ” STEP 3: Content Analysis

Summarize the main points or argument in 2-3 sentences:

List 3 key quotes or details that stand out to you:

1.

2.

3.

What language or tone does the author use?

โ˜ Formal
โ˜ Emotional
โ˜ Objective/Factual
โ˜ Persuasive
โ˜ Sympathetic
โ˜ Dismissive
โ˜ Celebratory
โ˜ Critical

โš ๏ธ STEP 4: Identifying Bias & Perspective (CRITICAL!)

Remember: ALL sources have bias - they reflect the author's background, beliefs, and purpose. The question is not "Is there bias?" but "What biases exist and how do they shape the story?"

What assumptions or biases can you detect in this document?

How might the author's position (colonial official, chief, settler, etc.) have shaped their view?

What does this document REVEAL about the time period?

What does this document CONCEAL or leave out?

๐Ÿ‘๏ธ STEP 5: Considering Multiple Perspectives

Decolonizing History: We must ask whose voices are centered and whose are silenced. How would this story change if told by someone else?

Whose perspective is represented in this document?

โ˜ Mฤori
โ˜ Pฤkehฤ (European)
โ˜ Colonial Government
โ˜ British Crown
โ˜ Settlers
โ˜ Women
โ˜ Children
โ˜ Other: _______________

Whose voices are MISSING from this document?

If Mฤori voices are missing: What might rangatira, warriors, whฤnau, or kaumฤtua from this time have said about these events?

How might this document be different if created by someone from a different background?

โญ STEP 6: Historical Significance & Connections

Why is this document historically important?

How does this document connect to what you've learned about Te Tiriti o Waitangi, the Land Wars, or Mฤori resistance?

What questions does this document raise for you?

๐ŸŽฏ STEP 7: Assessing Reliability

How reliable is this document as historical evidence?

โ˜ Very Reliable - First-hand account, supported by other sources

โ˜ Somewhat Reliable - Useful but biased or incomplete

โ˜ Limited Reliability - Heavily biased, missing key perspectives

โ˜ Unreliable - Propaganda, misinformation, or extreme bias

Explain your reliability rating:

๐Ÿ’ก Final Synthesis

In 3-4 sentences, what did you learn from analyzing this document? What new insights do you have about Aotearoa's colonial history?

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿซ Teacher Notes

Purpose: This template teaches critical historical thinking with a decolonizing lens - centering multiple perspectives and identifying whose voices are privileged vs silenced in historical records.

Suggested Documents to Analyze:

Teaching Strategy:

Assessment Focus:

NZ Curriculum Links: